Method
Where every number comes from, and what is never claimed
Everything here is read from a published document or a public register. Nothing is measured, nothing is estimated, and a figure that could not be found is written as not found rather than filled in.
| Casino | Coins listed | Ceiling on the way out | Amount that triggers documents | Licence | Visit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vavepays for this link | not published | not published | not published | not published | Go to site |
| Bitcasino.io | not published | 1,000,000 USDT a week clause 6.10 | 2,500 EUR | Curaçao Gaming Authority | |
| Empire.io | not published | not published | 2,000 USDT | Anjouan Gaming Board licence bars NL | |
| Bitsler | not published | not published | not published | Curaçao Gaming Authority | |
| Cloudbet | 40 | not published | not published | Curaçao Gaming Authority | |
| CoinCasino | not published | 500,000 EUR a month clause 9.6 | not published | Anjouan Gaming Board licence bars NL | |
| Rakebit | 15 | not published | not published | Anjouan Gaming Board licence bars NL | |
| Primedice | not published | not published | not published | Government of Curaçao | |
| Stake | not published | not published | not published | Curaçao Gaming Authority | |
| BetPlays | not published | 5,000 EUR a week clause 6.11 | not published | not published |
One kind of source counts: the operator's own document
Every figure about an operator on this site — a coin count, a withdrawal ceiling, a verification threshold, a licence number — comes from that operator's own published terms or from the register of the authority that issued the licence. Where a clause number exists, it is printed beside the figure so the sentence can be found again at the source.
What does not count as a source: other comparison sites, forums, review aggregators, and the operator's own marketing outside the terms. This is not snobbery about second-hand information, it is a practical consequence of how numbers travel. A figure copied from one page to another loses its provenance in a single hop and looks identical to a sourced one afterwards. Two hops later nobody can say whether it was ever in a clause.
The clearest example in this set is the verification threshold. Two operators publish an amount. Seven publish a discretionary rule containing no amount at all. Any confident figure you find attached to those seven was not read out of their terms, because there is nothing there to read — and yet such figures circulate, because a number is easier to publish than a blank.
Blank means looked for and not found
An empty cell on this site means one thing: the operator publishes nothing on that point that could be read. It never means zero, never means unlimited, and never means the usual figure for this kind of site.
This rule is the spine of the whole thing, because its opposite is so much more convenient. A column with nine of ten cells filled looks like work. A column with eight blanks looks like a gap in the research. In this set the second is the more accurate object: that eight of ten operators publish no countable coin list, and that seven of ten publish no withdrawal ceiling, are findings about the industry rather than failures of the search.
The rule is applied in the direction that costs this site money as well as the direction that does not. Vave pays for the single commercial link here. Vave publishes no readable terms page at all, so its row is blank in every fact column: no coins, no ceiling, no verification amount, no licence number. If the rule were bent anywhere, that is the row where it would be bent, and a rule with one exception is a preference.
Network facts and operator facts are kept apart
Two kinds of statement appear on this site and they are held to different standards.
A statement about a blockchain — that confirmation waits depend on the chain and its congestion, that Tron and Litecoin transfers sit at the cheap end of the fee range while Ethereum sits well above and Bitcoin between them — is a general property of public networks. It does not belong to any operator and is written without a clause number, as an ordering rather than a price.
A statement about an operator — a ceiling, a threshold, a coin count, a licence — is quoted from a document and carries its clause. Where the clause number itself is not published, that is said too: Rakebit and Primedice state a discretionary verification rule without a citable clause number, and that is written as it stands rather than smoothed over.
Mixing the two is how a page ends up implying that a fast chain is a fast casino. They are separate links in the same route and one says nothing about the other.
No prices, no rates, no minutes
Three kinds of number are deliberately missing from this site.
No fee in euros or dollars. Network fees move continuously and sometimes by a large multiple within a day. A figure written into a page would be wrong within weeks while looking exactly as confident as it did when it was typed, and nothing on the page would tell a reader it had aged.
No exchange rate and no coin price. Same reason, more so.
No measured times. This site holds no funded accounts. Nothing has been deposited, nothing has been withdrawn, and no stopwatch has been run against any operator. There is therefore not one figure in minutes anywhere on these pages, and where a competing site publishes an average payout time for one of these ten, that number came from somewhere other than a document.
Licences: a number in a register, or unverified
A licence counts as verified here when the operator names a number and that number is found in the register of the authority that issued it. A named jurisdiction without a number is written as unverified — not as licensed.
In this set the licences read as follows. Bitcasino.io holds Curaçao Gaming Authority OGL/2023/111/0069, recorded Active. Bitsler holds Curaçao Gaming Authority OGL/2024/930/0387, Active. Cloudbet holds Curaçao Gaming Authority OGL/2024/328/0599, Active. Stake holds Curaçao Gaming Authority OGL/2024/1451/0918, Active. Primedice names 8048/JAZ from the Government of Curaçao, with no status recorded. Empire.io holds Anjouan Gaming Board ALSI-132405042-FI3, CoinCasino ALSI-142311005-FI2 and Rakebit ALSI-202602030-FI2, all recorded valid. BetPlays and Vave name no licence that could be read.
Three of the Anjouan holders — Empire.io, CoinCasino and Rakebit — carry a marker in the licence column. The standard conditions of that licence name the Netherlands as a prohibited jurisdiction, while those operators' own country lists do not name it. Both statements sit in the sources as written. This site does not decide which prevails; it prints them next to each other, because a contradiction between a licence and an operator's own terms is worth seeing before money moves.
What the table shows and what it cannot
The comparison table carries five columns: the operator, the published coin count, the ceiling on the way out, the amount that triggers a document request, and the licence. Each exists because at least one operator publishes something in it that differs from the others.
A fee column does not exist, and its absence is a decision rather than an oversight. Not one of the ten publishes a deposit or withdrawal fee in a citable form, so a fee column would read not published across all ten rows. A column no row can fill says nothing and exists only to suggest thoroughness.
The heading over the ceiling column covers two different kinds of rule — a cap per period and a threshold above which the same total is paid in instalments — so each cell states in words which one it is showing. Two figures of those two kinds placed side by side without their wording would be a false statement made by a table rather than by a sentence, which is not an improvement.
The paid link
This site earns from one link, to Vave. It is marked as advertising wherever it appears and carries the attribute that tells search engines it is paid. If an account is opened through it, this site is paid.
What that arrangement does not touch: the order of the table, the contents of any clause, and whether inconvenient facts about the advertiser get written down. Vave's row is blank in every fact column on this site, its licence is unverified because no number is published, and its acceptance of players from the Netherlands is recorded as unverified because its own country list could not be read. All of that is on the page because it is what the sources support.
Who writes this and how the site is run is on who writes this.